STUDIO MX 2004 REVIEW BY EWEEKSATURDAY, OCTOBER 25 2003 @ 12:12 PMWell, this time I don't bring congratulations. Either they only spent a couple of hours with Studio, or just stuffed the article with what people have been blogging about for weeks, if no months. However, it is interesting that they criticize the Normal Mode turn down, after saying that the timeline and frame metaphor "never felt right for this type of application".
I usually find eWeek's product reviews interesting and trustworthy, but this particular article doesn't add up at all. I'm afraid it seriously looks like they didn't bother doing a revision of their own, and just copied someone else's notes. If they did a serious revision, they would have found a whole lot of other great features, and holes too. As Vera just made me realize, they don't say anything about Fireworks, nothing relevant to an "Web-oriented image editing tool" at least. I just hope, the reviews I've read before on eWeek aren't as weak as this one... Archived under: Flash. | Permalink | google | del.icio.us | digg ![]() DURSUNDECEMBER 17 2005 @ 01:03 PMkey
|
LANGUAGESARTICLES
BOOK REVIEWSSYNDICATIONFLASH
FLASH (ESPA�OL)
ADOBE
AGGREGATORS
USER GROUPS |
|


