‘Master’ and ‘Slave’ Non-sense?
My recycled Linux box died today without any warning. Since the beginning, I thought it was the power source, but opened it anyway to see if something was going on inside, since I didn’t smell anything burnt. While moving components around within the box, I got this curious view:

and I remembered this thing about LA officials recommending manufacturers to discontinue the use of the terms ‘master’ and ‘slave’ on labels for computer parts supplied to the county.
When I first saw this a few days ago in CNN.com, I thought it was going to be everywhere, so I didn’t blog about it then. Maybe everybody else thought the same, or it is just so silly that nobody considered it worth a blog post
However, the issue got me thinking after awhile…
Promoters of this ban sustain that “Based on the cultural diversity and sensitivity of Los Angeles County, this is not an acceptable identification label (…)”. Now, those have been in use for how long? 50 years? more or less… so, how does it become an issue just today? I mean, it’s been a lot of time and I don’t know about anybody feeling uncomfortable about their disks labeled “master” or “slave”.
Besides, it’s just the labels marking components the ones that use those words. CMOs usually refer to non-removable drives in the same way, and those would be harder to change….
I found it during one of my regular visits to the Virgin Records store located in Times Square. It was a surprise, since the production wasn’t being as heavily advertised as other new releases…